Álvaro Múnera: This photo is not what it seems…


The above photo has been doing the rounds on the internet with claims it is Álvaro Múnera Builes, a Colombian animal rights activist who worked briefly as a bullfighter in his youth under the name ‘El Pilarico’ in Colombia and then Spain. With the image comes these words, also claiming to be from Múnera.

And suddenly, I looked at the bull. He had this innocence that all animals have in their eyes, and he looked at me with this pleading. It was like a cry for justice, deep down inside of me. I describe it as being like a prayer – because if one confesses, it is hoped, that one is forgiven. I felt like the worst shit on earth.

In fact, not only is this not true, it could not be true, not least because the matador in the photo is actually Francisco Javier Sánchez Vara, pictured right, who is still working as a bullfighter in Spain. Meanwhile the words actually come from an article by the author and melodramatist Antonio Gala Velasco in the Spanish newspaper El País in 1995.

Below is how Múnera actually looked in the ‘suit of lights’ of a novillero. A novillero is a novice bullfighter. Múnera never even became a matador, let alone a famous one.

However, the most compelling reason that photo can have had nothing to do with Múnera is that he did not leave bullfighting because of some conversion in the bullring; quite the reverse. It was the bull that made him leave.

In 1984 a bull called ‘Terciopelo’, from the breed of Marqués de Villagodio, caught him in the foot and tossed him across the ring, fracturing the fifth cervical vertebrae in his neck – along with other injuries – which rendered him permanently paraplegic.

It was only later after he had been transferred from hospital in Spain to a recuperative facility in Miami to be closer to his relatives in Colombia that he developed a ‘moral’ problem with bullfighting. According to his own account, it was the doctors, nurses, other patients and their families treating him with contempt because of his bullfighting past which caused the change. In his own words, he converted to their point of view because “there are more of them, they must be right.”

Whatever you think of this as a reason for revising the moral code by which you have lived your life, it is clear that it was not the behaviour of a bull while dying that caused this man to end his run of 150 bulls killed.

So, what is the actual matador, Sánchez Vara, doing in the photo?

Well, the reason he is sitting down in the path a dying bull as it walks along the barrier has nothing to do with despair. Which is why you can see the situation exactly replicated below by the more famous matador Sebastian Castella.

Sitting on the ‘strip’ around the ring after the sword has been placed in the bull is a known desplante, or act of defiance, within the part-scripted, part-improvised spectacle that is the corrida de toros. Whatever the corrida is, it is certainly not a fight. The English word bull-fight derives from the English pastime of baiting bulls with dogs, hence their national symbol is the bulldog and Spain’s is the bull. The concept of fairness or sport no more enters into the corrida than it does the slaughterhouse.

Whatever you feel about bullfighting, there is no excuse for dishonesty – from either side of the debate. And before decisions on a subject are made, it is worth knowing what that subject actually is.

Without the bullfight, there would be no fighting bulls, a distinct breed. You can read more about these magnificent and extraordinary creatures and their world in the book Into The Arena: The World Of The Spanish Bullfight

(With thanks to Reinhard Keck from Bild am Sonntag, 6Toros6 and Dave Johnson for additional research)

4 thoughts on “Álvaro Múnera: This photo is not what it seems…

  1. Pingback: – The Last Arena

  2. Pingback: The famous ‘conversion’ photo of the ‘matador’ Álvaro Múnera is… | The Last Arena

  3. Bull fighting is disgusting!
    Not at all brave!
    A righteous man is merciful to his animals!
    But a cruel man destroys His own soul!
    This barbarism should be banned in this day and age!!!
    They will answer to God for their cruel vanity on judgement day!

    I occasionally publish comments like this so people can see the calibre of anti-taurine sentiment. The first sentence is an assertion of an emotional response to a point of view on bullfighting, which is fine. The second, however, is simply false. Overcoming fear is the definition of bravery, whether one agrees with the morality of the outcome or not. As for the ever-present trope of “this day and age”, doesn’t that rather contradict the citation of the eternal verities of God and the Apocalypse?
    Either bullfighting was always wrong or it was not. And it is not.
    Alexander Fiske-Harrison

Leave a comment